Search This Blog
Friday, 19 October 2012
Sunday, 14 October 2012
Impedance matching–What does a mountain bicycle has in common with a transformer
As a cyclist and a transformer user, can’t help to notice the similarity of the two. So below is the picture of a mountain-bicycle and transformer taken from my favourite source Wikipedia.
To compare them, look at the table of comparison below:
A Bicycle | A Transformer |
number of “teeth” of sprocket | number of winding |
front sprocket | primary winding |
rear sprocket | secondary winding |
gear chain | transformer core |
now, isn’t this amazing?
To understand sprocket, visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprocket
Pictures from :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer
To understand sprocket, visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprocket
Pictures from :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer
Friday, 5 October 2012
Getting to know simulation - Part11 - Monte Carlo
To best
illustrate the usefulness of the monte-carlo
simulation, let’s use a voltage divider as example.
Run Transient simulation and get:
So this is
a perfect voltage divider. But we all knows that resistor has tolerance, let’s
say each of R1, R2 has 1% tolerance. We should factor this in by running Monte Carlo simulation and see what are we dealing with.
Enter 1% as
the resistor tolerance.
Tick “Enable
multi-step” to enable Monte-Carlo analysis
Set number
of runs to 100
Re-run the
transient simulation to see gain statistic of divider made of 2 pieces of 1% resistor.
With resistor tolerance of 1%, the voltage divider will give an error of ~-0.9% to ~+1%.
Use of Monte-Carlo simulation will ease such analysis. If your application cannot tolerate such variance, then resistors with better tolerance are needed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)